|
From Photo Op to Performance Based State
Government
Mark Bitz
January 2, 2005
Although New Yorkers may enjoy the fruits of democracy at the federal
and local levels, at the state level we face the rule of three. This
concentration of power, as with almost all concentration of power, over
time yields arrogance, corruption, sloth, and ineptness. Upstate NY
voters are disgusted with their state government, but are puzzled what
to do about it. Meaningful data on Upstate New York’s performance
relative to other states is not regularly reported. The impression that
our government representatives are such nice, helpful people may cause
us to believe they are doing the best they can.
After some thought and research, I was
able to construct, what might be called the State After-Tax Income
Index. Using state per capita income data,
Upstate NY per capita income data, and federal, state, and local tax
information, I was constructed an excellent measure to see how Upstate
NY is performing relative to other states.
The State
After-Tax Income Index
is simply what people of a state earn on a per capita basis after they
pay federal, state, and local taxes relative to the US average. An
index below 100 means people in a state have less to spend than the
national average and a reading over 100 means they have more to spend.
The State After-Tax Income Index is a great predictor of which
states will grow and which will decline. It is also an excellent
measure to evaluate the effectiveness of state governments. The
following table shows the index for 5 states and Upstate NY for the
years 1990, 2000, and 2002. The table also lists the state’s 1990–2000
change in population.
State After-Tax Income Index
|
|
1990 |
2000 |
1990-2000 |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
% Population Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
108 |
108 |
18% |
109 |
|
Massachusetts |
120 |
124 |
6% |
124 |
|
Minnesota |
99 |
107 |
12% |
109 |
|
New
Hampshire |
110 |
114 |
11% |
113 |
|
West
Virginia |
76 |
77 |
1% |
79 |
|
Upstate New York |
90 |
86 |
1% |
84 |
Data Sources include
www.infoplease.com,
www.taxfoundation.org, and
www.brookings.edu.
The table shows Delaware’s After-Tax Per
Capita Income to be 108% of the national average in 1990 and 109% in
2002. Delaware is a well-led state. It is no surprise its population
grew 18% in the 1990’s. Massachusetts, with an index of 120 in 1990 and
124 in 2000, has high and improving After-Tax incomes. Minnesota with
an index of 99 in 1990 and 109 in 2002, and New Hampshire with an index
of 110 in 1990 and 113 in 2002, improved their After-Tax incomes and
experienced significant population growth in the 1990’s. Both Minnesota
and New Hampshire accomplished this growth despite having cold northern
climates. West Virginia’s index is 79, which is one of the lowest of
all of the 50 states. Its per capita After-Tax income is 21% below the
national average.
After-Tax incomes in Upstate NY were 90%
of the national average in 1990, 86% in 2000, and 84% of the national
average in 2002. Upstate NY is a sinking ship. Incomes that were
once only 10% below the national average are now 16% below it.
Given the great educational resources, excellent workforce, tremendous
infrastructure, and New York’s economic base of the 1960’s, Upstate NY’s
After-Tax incomes should be well above the national average. In the
last 30 years, our state
government has completely squandered one of the greatest economies in
the country, as well as all of our livelihoods.

In a country where there are no barriers
to moving, talent and capital tend to move to where they earn the
highest return. As talent and capital move into an area, people’s
standards of living increase. As the talent and capital leave an area,
people’s standard of living and the economic base on which taxes are
assessed declines. Until the leadership in NYS turns the upstate ship
around and dramatically improves our After-Tax incomes, voters might
want to use the following guideline to decide for whom to vote.
|
When the index for Upstate NY is
above 110 and stays the same or increases each year, then vote
for the incumbent governor and the candidates in a house’s
majority party. When the index is below 110 and fails to
increase at least 1% each year, vote for candidates challenging
the incumbent governor, as well as the candidates who are in a
house’s minority party. |
Recessions do not affect this voting
rule of thumb as the index measures how Upstate NY incomes are doing
relative to the national average. All incomes decline in a recession.
The index only changes as Upstate NY does better or worse relative to
the nation as a whole.
So why is the State
After-Tax Income Index a good basis to determine how one
votes? Because, if After-Tax per capita income is high or increasing:
1) There will be
fewer unemployed people,
2) Our homes and
property will appreciate more,
3) Schools
districts will have greater tax revenues,
4) Health insurance
will be affordable to more people,
5) College will be
affordable to more people,
6) There will be
more money available for the arts from thriving businesses,
7) Businesses will
have more money available for charities,
8) There will be
additional funds invested in research and development,
9) Government will
take proportionally less from people and better fund its agencies,
10) Our friends
will be less likely to move away,
11) Our
children will be able to find high paying jobs locally,
12) Our
grandchildren will be more apt to live near us,
13) A
smaller proportion of the population will be retired, and
14) There will be
greater state and local tax revenue to pay for Medicare.
The State
After-Tax Income Index is also a good way to determine how to vote
as representatives will spend less time raising money for reelection and
subject us to fewer campaign ads. Winning office will be less about
image and more about raising people’s After-Tax incomes.
To understand the effects of the State’s policies that have caused
Upstate NY After-Tax income to fall to 84% of the national average
rather than grow to 100% of the national average, consider the
following. According to the IRS tax tables and the Tax Foundation, an
Upstate NY family earning $80,000 per year pays $9,500 in federal taxes
and $10,300 in state and local taxes. After paying these taxes, the
family has $60,200 to spend and/or save. Because of Upstate NY’s high
state and local taxes and the exodus of so many employers from the
state, a similar family doing the same work earns $90,000 per year in
most other states. This family pays $12,000 in federal taxes and $9,000
in state and local taxes, and has $69,000 to spend after paying their
taxes. The Upstate NY family has $8,800
less to spend each year than a comparable family in other states.
Over a forty-year career, this amounts to $350,000. Were the
out-of-state family to invest its additional $8,800 each year, and earn
5% a year on the savings, the difference in After-Tax income would grow
to over a million dollars in forty years.
The concentration of power and lack of democracy
matter in New York because they have led to a series of laws and
policies that lower all of our standards of living.
The NY State Legislature’s policies have made Workers’ Compensation,
Health Insurance, Energy, and Sales, Income and Property Taxes so much
higher than any other state that we have the poorest business climate in
the country. In the nineties, the US added 37% more high skilled
manufacturing jobs, while New York lost 14% of the ones it had. In the
last 14 years, Upstate New York lost 530,000 high paying manufacturing
jobs. Upstate NY After-Tax incomes are now 16% below the national
average.
In the last seven years, the Governor,
Majority Leader, and Speaker skirted the NYS Constitution, had state
public authorities borrow over $1 billion dollars, and provided
representatives supportive of their agendas hundreds of thousands of
dollars to distribute to projects in the representatives’ districts.
The majority in the senate and assembly has not changed in 30 years.
Calculating statisticians draw voting districts to optimize a majority’s
hold on power. The Majority Leader and Speaker appoint committee
chairs, hire their staffs, set committee and member staff budgets,
distribute lulus, and decide which bills are brought to vote. They
distribute hundreds of thousands of dollars of state campaign dollars to
majority members who face competition. In this manner, the leadership
coerces a majority of our representatives to support their personal
agendas and a few special interests.
Each year in office,
incumbents raise and accumulate thousands of dollars to deter
challengers. One out of three incumbents runs unopposed. Incumbents
win their races 99% of the time. It is no surprise that the Center
for Democracy ranked the New York State government the least
democratic of all 50 states.
Democracy at its best
follows a written constitution and set of written rules, divides and
checks power, fosters competition for representation, and creates a
transparent forum for the competition of ideas, formulation of laws, and
conduct of business. The competition inherent with democracy fosters
excellence. The genius of a well working democracy is that all
interests are represented and no interest is over-represented. In
short, democracy, more than any other form of government, delivers the
greatest good for the greatest number. Almost without exception,
democracy delivers throughout the world the highest standards of living
and quality of life.
For Upstate
NY incomes to improve, all upstate citizens must stand together and
encourage the NYS Senate and Assembly members to do the right thing. In
late December, prior to the legislature’s first session in January when
each house votes on the rules under which it will operate, we need to
send Senate Majority Leader Bruno, Assembly Speaker Silver, and each of
our NYS Senate and Assembly representatives the following message. (See
FreeNYS.org to download the letter and for senators’ and
assembly members’ emails, phone numbers, and addresses.)
Dear
All New Yorkers know the NYS Senate and
Assembly has been the most dysfunctional legislature in the country.
The New York Brennan Center for Justice studied the problem and
developed 17 common sense rule reforms for each house to pass during
their opening session. Several of my friends and I request that you
help enact all 17 rule reforms, not 3 of them, not 12 of them, but all
17 of them.
My friends and I will be watching the Upstate
NY After-Tax Income Index. We know that Upstate NY After-Tax
Incomes are now 16% below the national average. For candidates in
the majority party of each house to earn our votes, Upstate NY After-Tax
Income relative to the US average must gain at least 1% per year. If
this is not the case, we will not vote for candidates of the majority
party in their respective houses.
Also, we request that you pass Voter
Initiative. The NYS Senate has already passed a bill that would
enact Voter Initiative and Governor Pataki has indicated he would sign
the bill.
We recognize that in some states the
bar to place an initiative before the voters is too low and in some
states a little high. We would ask for Voter Initiative with a moderate
level of difficulty for groups to put policies before the voters. The
very able Brennan Center for Justice could research and recommend a
Voter Initiative Law.
Please avoid the condescending thought
that voters of New York will approve initiatives counterproductive to
their interests. We remind you that the NYS Senate’s and Assembly’s
record of looking out for the average citizen is atrocious, as
evidenced by the low Upstate NY After-Tax income, as well as the loss of
530,000 excellent paying jobs the last 14 years. Democracy works
the world over; and direct democracy, which is what Voter Initiative is,
works the best of all types of democracy.
Sincerely,
P.S. New
York State leadership’s poor handling of the funding of inner city
schools is the latest of a thousand examples of the need for change in
Albany.
Voting by
the State After-Tax Income Index will force lawmakers to serve
honestly the interests of all New York citizens. The state leadership
cannot insidiously raise registration fees, levy hidden taxes on energy
and other business inputs, or pass mandates that local governments must
fund, as the State After-Tax Income Index will capture their
every move. The state leaders cannot act like warring bullies on an
elementary playground and remain in office long. The state leaders will
have to create an environment that attracts and retains all businesses
rather than rescue a politically supportive few. Voting by the index
will force lawmakers to serve honestly the interests of all New York
citizens or face removal from office.
|